As to “Avatar”, it’s no so easy to express my feelings as I thought before. It is, no doubt, an amazing spectacle – though I was expecting something like this, but got more than expected. It’s important that this is not clear computer animation, which has no relation to the true cinematography, like “2012″ is, with its various unrealistic effects and great number well-known imprints. Frankly saying, Avatar is also can be reproached with over-use of all existing stamps – but at the same time it has a very fascinating and absolutely unpredictable scenario then this fact rises the movie to another level. On the other hand, I guess that two and a half hundreds millions of dollars is price good enough for the scenario that must be.
It seems that director of Avatar, James Cameron behaves like a boy, carrying to the movie screen all his dreams and fantasies over though it were high technologies or erotic dreams (despite the inhabitants of the planet Pandora are totally deprived of primary sexual characteristics, however their shapes, movements and facial expressions came exactly from wet teen dreams. The fact is Cameron invented an unreal steep tale and embodied it on the movie screen then he is praiseworthy for that, but
But the point is there is a big lie in Avatar. This movie as a product of the era of high technology is likely protects the mother-nature from these technologies, and ultimate leftist manifesto about self-determination of developing countries is advertised by McDonald. That confused me. It’s not funny at all it is rather ridiculous, rude and finally disgusting. And, besides, most part of the audience, reared with much care exactly by products produced by such corporations, look this movie as a high-tech show – just belching with Coca-Cola, throwing over with popcorn and unstopping laughing all the time. After all “Avatar” is just a high-tech show independently what kind of massage Cameron wanted to put in.
